The Knesset plenum approved on Wednesday to grant Likud MK Tally Gotliv immunity after she was indicted for disclosing and publishing classified confidential information in violation of the Shin Bet law by exposing the identity of a Shin Bet officer.

In the final vote, 62 lawmakers voted in favor, and 48 voted against.

Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara, who filed the indictment, had attended two of the three lengthy debates held in the Knesset's House Committee last week.

She had told the panel that Gotliv created a severe security risk by exposing the personal details of a Shin Bet agent during wartime.

Gotliv's argument has centered around the claim that sharing the officer's identity was warranted, and she has not denied doing so.

Immunity from criminal prosecution

Under the Knesset Members' Immunity Law, Gotliv was able to request that the Knesset grant her immunity from criminal prosecution before the case proceeded to court.

Ahead of the final plenum vote on Wednesday, Likud MK Yuli Edelstein released a statement that he would not be voting in favor of Gotliv's immunity. He argued that granting Gotliv immunity could set a precedent that would allow other lawmakers, including left-wing or Arab MKs, to receive immunity after violating the law as well.

If Arab Knesset members had revealed the names of Mossad agents and Shin Bet officers, would we also stay silent? There are consequences to everything, he said.

No other coalition MKs voted against Gotliv's immunity. Haredi MKs voted in favor, despite their parties' recent announcement of a boycott of coalition votes in response to a delay in controversial legislation they have been seeking to advance.

Coalition lawmakers in the plenum celebrated with Gotliv after the vote, embracing her.

Coalition whip MK Ofir Katz opened the discussion, in which he expressed his support for Gotliv's immunity and sharply criticized Baharav-Miara, arguing that she was attempting to interfere with the government's work.

Baharav-Miara filed the indictment against Gotliv in May for publishing the identity of the partner of protest leader Shikma Bressler, who, according to the indictment, was a Shin Bet employee.

The attorney-general has argued that Gotliv's actions do not allow her to qualify for parliamentary immunity and that she created a severe security risk through the exposure of the Shin Bet officer.

The attorney-general presented committee members last week with a top-secret document containing a professional opinion issued by the Shin Bet.

MKs who were shown the ultra-classified Shin Bet opinion said it stated that Gotliv endangered the life of an agent, as well as his children and family, according to a Channel 13 report.

Shin Bet agents' lives at risk

The main part of the classified opinion detailed real examples of Shin Bet employees whose names were exposed, putting their lives at real and immediate risk, the report added.

Gotliv told the panel that she did the act knowingly, arguing that it was justified and that she should receive immunity as an MK. Gotliv also focused for multiple hours on renewing claims that treason had taken place during the October 7 attacks and presented various theories on the matter.

Her remarks involved a lengthy personal attack against Baharav-Miara. She also screened a video last week to the panel with clips that she presented as evidence of betrayal during the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks. She made accusations of treason that she claimed took place during the attacks, presenting various theories to the panel and sparking outrage from opposition MKs.

The charge listed in the indictment against Gotliv is revealing and publishing confidential information under the Shin Bet law.

Why are you indicting me? Because you do not know what to do with me. I acted under the authority of my immunity. I exposed Bressler's partner, Gotliv told last week's panel.

Opposition coordinator Yesh Atid MK Merav Ben-Ari told the panel that in all the hours Gotliv spoke, she did not once address the offense she is here for today.

Not only did she take no responsibility, but she amplified the offense she committed. She provided no testimony or shred of evidence to support her claims, Ben-Ari added.

Opposition lawmakers repeatedly spoke against committee chairperson Katz's conduct during the debates and penned a letter to Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana about it. They objected to the fact that he continuously kicked out MKs for interrupting Gotliv, while he allowed Gotliv to interrupt the A-G as she presented her stance to the panel.

Lawmakers were not allowed to interrupt if they did not want to be removed from the panel, and the rules stipulated that only MKs who participated in all meetings on the matter would be eligible to vote. Attendance for at least half the duration of a meeting would be considered participation. As a result, some opposition lawmakers were unable to partake in the deciding vote.

Ahead of the first Knesset debate on Monday, Baharav-Miara wrote a letter to members of the panel, requesting that Gotliv's immunity be denied.

She explained that the indictment against Gotliv was filed on the basis of professional, objective, and good-faith discretion, and that none of the grounds for parliamentary immunity applied in her case.

The Movement for Quality Government warned last week against the decision to grant Gotliv immunity, stating that parliamentary immunity was not being applied properly.

The organization noted that the Knesset committee chose to protect an elected official who is accused of a serious offense, the disclosure and publication of classified information in violation of the Shin Bet Law, a publication which, according to reports, endangered the life of a Shin Bet official and his family.

Parliamentary immunity is intended to protect the work of the Knesset and the freedom of action of elected officials, and not to serve as a shield against criminal proceedings, the group added.

It further stated that the Knesset should not be turned into a safe haven for criminals, and called on lawmakers to reject the immunity request in the upcoming final plenum vote.